Financial Services Penetration Testing
Penetration testing that hardens your financial systems, not just checks a regulatory box.
Penetration Testing Built for Financial Examinations
Financial institutions are the most targeted sector for cyberattacks. Raxis delivers human-led, AI-augmented penetration testing built for the regulatory complexity and high-value targets of banks, credit unions, and financial services organizations.
The Problem with Most Financial Services Pentests
Banks and financial institutions face more regulatory scrutiny around penetration testing than almost any other industry, and the stakes keep climbing: IBM puts the average financial-sector breach at $5.56 million, and the 2025 Verizon DBIR found third-party involvement in breaches doubled to 30% while vulnerability exploitation rose 34% year over year. Yet many organizations still get a scan report repackaged as a pentest.
Automated Scans Passed Off as Pentests
Some vendors run a vulnerability scanner, wrap the output in a branded PDF, and call it a penetration test. That won’t satisfy an FFIEC examiner who understands the difference, and it won’t find the chained exploits, business logic flaws, or transaction manipulation paths that real attackers use against financial systems. Raxis engineers manually test your environment the way an adversary would.
Digital Banking Channels Nobody Tested End-to-End
Online banking portals, mobile apps, payment APIs, and wire transfer systems all process sensitive financial data and customer NPI. Network-only testing misses the application-layer vulnerabilities where most financial breaches actually happen. Raxis tests the full transaction path, from authentication to fund movement.
Internal Segmentation That Hasn’t Been Proven
Financial institutions segment core banking systems from general corporate networks, branch infrastructure, and customer-facing environments. But segmentation only matters if it holds under real attack conditions. If your pentest vendor isn’t actively attempting lateral movement across those boundaries, you don’t know if they work. We do.
Regulatory Requirements Keep Expanding
The FTC Safeguards Rule under GLBA now mandates annual penetration testing and semi-annual vulnerability assessments for non-bank financial institutions. NYDFS Part 500 requires annual penetration testing from inside and outside your systems’ boundaries. Banks and credit unions answer to FFIEC and NCUA examiners who expect risk-based testing regardless of any single mandate.
What Your Regulator Expects from Penetration Testing
Every financial regulator asks for security testing. None of them ask for it the same way. Here is where penetration testing shows up, requirement by requirement.
|
Regulator / Rule |
Who It Covers |
What It Requires |
|
FTC Safeguards Rule (GLBA, 16 CFR 314.4) |
Non-bank financial institutions: mortgage and auto lenders, brokers, advisors, tax preparers |
Annual penetration testing and semi-annual vulnerability assessments, unless you run continuous monitoring |
|
NYDFS Part 500 (500.5) |
Entities licensed under NY banking, insurance, or financial services law |
Annual penetration testing from inside and outside the information systems’ boundaries by a qualified party, plus automated vulnerability scanning |
|
FFIEC guidance |
Banks and thrifts examined by OCC, FDIC, and the Federal Reserve |
Risk-based internal and external penetration testing, including social engineering. With the CAT retired in August 2025, examiners now look to NIST CSF 2.0 and the CRI Cyber Profile |
|
NCUA (Part 748 / ISE) |
Credit unions |
The Information Security Examination scales testing expectations by asset size: SCUEP, CORE, and CORE+, with CORE+ explicitly covering penetration testing of wireless, applications, and firewall rules |
|
PCI DSS v4.0.1 (11.4) |
Anyone handling cardholder data |
Annual internal and external penetration testing, segmentation testing, and retesting of fixes. Full details on our PCI penetration testing page |
One Raxis engagement produces evidence mapped to every row that applies to you. Your compliance team hands each examiner the same report and it holds up.
Penetration Testing for Credit Unions
The NCUA does not flatly mandate penetration testing, and some vendors will tell you that means you can skip it. Your examiner likely disagrees. The Information Security Examination (ISE) sets testing expectations that scale with asset size, and Part 748 Appendix A expects you to regularly test the key controls protecting member data.
SCUEP, CORE, and CORE+
Small credit unions under SCUEP procedures need documented security testing fundamentals. CORE procedures expect internal and external vulnerability scanning and penetration testing. CORE+ goes further: wireless testing, application testing, firewall rule review, and testing around core conversions. We scope credit union engagements to the ISE tier your examiner will actually use.
Member data is NPI, and examiners treat it that way
Account records, loan applications, and share draft data all qualify as Nonpublic Personal Information under GLBA and Part 748. We test the paths an attacker would take to reach it: member-facing online banking, third-party core processors, branch networks, and the segmentation between them.
